A blog from the Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Service

When firearms enter the home: Domestic abuse and coercion in Northern Ireland

Reading Time: 4 minutes
A photograph of the plenary chamber of the Northern Ireland Assembly
Imae: Northern Ireland Assembly

This blog article contains references to domestic abuse and domestic homicide, which some readers may find distressing. Please read with care. If you are affected, support is available through organisations such as Women’s Aid.

On 23 July 2025, a woman and her two children were killed in Maguiresbridge, County Fermanagh, using a legally held firearm. While the perpetrator was not the licensed holder of the weapon, the case raises important questions about access to firearms within domestic settings. This devastating incident highlights a difficult but critical issue: the role firearms can play in domestic abuse, and how Northern Ireland’s unique context may increase risks for women.

Firearms in Northern Ireland: A distinct context

Northern Ireland differs from the rest of the UK in several important ways when it comes to firearms.

At the time of writing, there are around 53,000 active firearm licences in Northern Ireland. Each licence may cover more than one weapon, meaning the total number of firearms in circulation is unknown. While stricter rules around firearm licensing have recently been introduced in England, Scotland and Wales, these changes do not apply in Northern Ireland, where firearms policy is devolved.

Northern Ireland’s experience is shaped in part by its history of conflict. Some paramilitary groups are still active today, although their presence and influence can vary across different communities. These groups are believed to have access to illegal weapons, the number of which is not fully known. As a result, firearms (both those held legally and those held illegally) may be more visible in everyday life than in other parts of the UK.

The House of Commons has also recognised that, at a national level, when violent crime is not consistently followed by prosecution, it can make people less likely to come forward and report concerns, particularly where paramilitary influence is involved. This can affect how safe or confident people feel about engaging with official systems.

Reporting domestic abuse already requires significant courage. Where there is a perception that violence or abuse may not always lead to clear outcomes, some victims may feel unsure about seeking help or may disengage from support services altogether.

Another important difference is policing. Northern Ireland is the only part of the UK where police officers are routinely armed. Personal protection weapons may be taken home, although official guidance recommends storing them at police stations. This can create additional considerations in cases of domestic abuse involving police officers, where the abuser may have access to a firearm and the victim may face additional barriers to reporting concerns to the police.

Firearm ownership in Northern Ireland is also highly gendered. The vast majority of firearm certificate holders are men: around 97% as of January 2025. This matters when considering patterns of domestic abuse, where women are disproportionately victims.

Legally held firearms and domestic abuse

The Maguiresbridge case draws attention to the risks associated with legally held firearms, and family members who may have access to these. While licensing systems are designed to ensure that firearms are granted only to suitable individuals, concerns remain about how risks, particularly those linked to domestic abuse, are assessed.

In January 2025, it was reported that the PSNI had removed legally held firearms from almost 900 individuals over the previous two years due to concerns about their continued suitability to possess them. However, there is limited public information available on what factors lead to these decisions. It is unclear how often domestic abuse concerns feature in licensing or revocation decisions.

For victims, this lack of transparency has real consequences. A person may not know whether their partner owns a firearm, has applied for a licence, or has been assessed by authorities. In abusive relationships, asking these questions may not feel safe or possible. This uncertainty can increase fear and limit a person’s ability to plan for their own safety.

Illegal firearms and paramilitary influence

Alongside legally held firearms, illegal weapons remain a significant issue. By their nature, illegal firearms are not registered, tracked, or regulated. This makes it extremely difficult to monitor who has access to them or how they are used.

Paramilitary organisations play a key role in this context. Looking at paramilitarism through the lens of women’s lives shifts the focus away from political narratives and towards lived experience. For many women, the presence of paramilitary groups is not abstract. It shapes everyday safety, relationships, and choices.

Paramilitary influence can make it harder to report domestic abuse. Victims may fear retaliation, community consequences, or disbelief. In some cases, perpetrators may have connections to paramilitary groups, further increasing their power and control.

Coercion, threats, and the use of weapons

Firearms, whether legal or illegal, do not need to be fired to be used as tools of abuse. Their presence alone can be enough to control and intimidate. As part of coercive control, abusers often engage in what researchers describe as ‘stage-setting’. This means creating an environment where threats feel real and credible.

In Northern Ireland, this can involve both wider paramilitary norms and individual behaviour:

  • At a community level, paramilitary groups can establish a backdrop of authority and fear. Within a relationship, an abuser may draw on that context to reinforce their control. For example, they may reference paramilitary punishment practices or suggest connections with armed groups.
  • At a more direct level, abusers may use weapons themselves as a means of intimidation. This can include showing that they have access to firearms, making threats about their use, or staging acts that mimic violence, such as mock ‘punishment attacks’. These actions reinforce the message that harm is possible and immediate.

In some cases, women are also deliberately implicated in paramilitary-related activity, further trapping them in situations of abuse and making it harder to seek help.

The impact on women

The combination of legally held firearms, illegal weapons, and paramilitary influence creates a particularly complex and dangerous environment for women experiencing domestic abuse in Northern Ireland.

The risks are not only physical but psychological. The presence of firearms can intensify fear, limit choices, and increase a sense of isolation. Barriers to reporting, whether due to policing structures, community dynamics, or fear of retaliation, can leave women without safe options.

Understanding these dynamics is essential. In discussions with the Committee for Justice on 23 April 2026, researchers from the Women’s Resource and Development Agency highlighted the importance of continued attention to firearm licensing processes, transparency, and responses to domestic abuse that reflect Northern Ireland’s specific context. It is widely recognised that, while legally held firearms sit within regulatory frameworks, illegally held weapons present a distinct challenge, as they cannot be monitored or controlled in the same way.

The Committee for Justice has acknowledged the risks associated with firearms alongside the broader responsibilities and resource constraints faced by the PSNI and the criminal justice system. Addressing these issues requires balancing public safety, individual rights, and the practical limits of enforcement.

Ultimately, responding to the intersection of firearms, paramilitarism, and domestic abuse is about improving early identification of risk and ensuring that women are supported, believed, and protected wherever possible.